Is it still part of the breed?
Continuing here, not to hijack the other thread...
I agree with Brad about the pure bloodlines, but if thy start deviating from the standard systematically, they're going to go on a completely different path, potentially getting too different to still be considered part of the breed.
If you select a set of dogs to look a certain way and have certain temperament characteristics, and eventually that set of dogs will be considered a breed; by a sloppy selection that causes a heavy deviation from those characteristics might mean they're not part of the breed anymore.
Don't know if I made much sense..
I agree with Brad about the pure bloodlines, but if thy start deviating from the standard systematically, they're going to go on a completely different path, potentially getting too different to still be considered part of the breed.
If you select a set of dogs to look a certain way and have certain temperament characteristics, and eventually that set of dogs will be considered a breed; by a sloppy selection that causes a heavy deviation from those characteristics might mean they're not part of the breed anymore.
Don't know if I made much sense..
Comments
Are you asking about intentional variations or unintentional ones?
But on this case, I was going for the poorly bred pups.
I don't really know.. that was the best example in favor of your arguement, other than Japanese vs. American Akita that I could come up with!! Actually, wasn't the akita a deviated breed, and not part of the original ancestor breeds of Japan, but now considered an original breed of Japan?